久久99国产精品尤物-国产高清色播视频免费看-男生肌肌往女人桶爽视频-精品国产-91PORNY九色|www.jqdstudio.net

|  站內(nèi)搜索:
97年后的缺席——中國(guó)青年就南海仲裁案致海牙國(guó)際法庭各位法官公開信(中英文版)
點(diǎn)擊:  作者:中國(guó)青年    來(lái)源:中華全國(guó)學(xué)聯(lián)  發(fā)布時(shí)間:2016-05-29 09:06:47

 

菲律賓無(wú)視中國(guó)政府警告,單方面向海牙國(guó)際海洋法庭提出所謂南海仲裁案。 中國(guó)部分青年學(xué)生就此致信海牙國(guó)際法庭,表達(dá)了中國(guó)青年學(xué)生的鮮明立場(chǎng)。

 


 97年后的缺席 

海牙國(guó)際法庭的各位法官: 

閑悉所謂的南海仲裁案,將于近期在海牙國(guó)際法庭宣判。中國(guó)政府對(duì)此的態(tài)度是明確的,那就是不參與,不接受,不承認(rèn)。中國(guó)的代表將不會(huì)出現(xiàn)在南海仲裁案的法庭上,而這也注定無(wú)法成為對(duì)中國(guó)的缺席審判。說(shuō)到缺席,我們的思緒被拉回到了97年之前,1919年。同樣是在溫和濕潤(rùn)的歐洲大陸上,中國(guó)的代表曾經(jīng)經(jīng)歷另一次毅然的缺席:那便是中國(guó)代表拒絕在巴黎和會(huì)上簽字。時(shí)隔97年,中國(guó)人變了嗎? 

1919年的中國(guó),正處風(fēng)雨飄搖,國(guó)力衰微之際。當(dāng)時(shí)的民國(guó)政府,尚軍閥割據(jù),四分五裂。我們無(wú)力處理主權(quán)方面的爭(zhēng)端,對(duì)外國(guó)的入侵也只能是默然許之。因此,在德國(guó)所侵占的膠東半島和幾座軍港上,日本遠(yuǎn)征軍進(jìn)行了對(duì)德戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)并成為了一戰(zhàn)的戰(zhàn)勝國(guó)。而在巴黎和會(huì)中,同樣作為戰(zhàn)勝國(guó)的中國(guó)卻要蒙受領(lǐng)土被再度割占的恥辱,并被要求將山東劃給日本。這一幕,在中國(guó)的愛國(guó)電影《建國(guó)大業(yè)》中被完美重現(xiàn),外交代表顧維鈞拒絕簽字時(shí)那氣壯河山的演說(shuō)。是的,山東是中國(guó)的領(lǐng)土,我們作為戰(zhàn)勝國(guó),憑什么要將自己國(guó)家的一部分,拿去送給日本人? 

這樣的話,說(shuō)著是有底氣的。當(dāng)時(shí)的中國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi),剛剛爆發(fā)了五四運(yùn)動(dòng),全體的年輕人,胸膛里都燒著愛國(guó)而憤怒的烈火。他們?yōu)閲?guó)為民,支持外交人員,堅(jiān)強(qiáng)不屈。正是這一磚一瓦地堆壘起來(lái)的中國(guó)青年的愛國(guó)心,成就了當(dāng)時(shí)羸弱的國(guó)家的底氣。近百年后的今天,面對(duì)所謂的裁決和所謂的協(xié)約,中國(guó)人再次缺席,又是因?yàn)轭I(lǐng)土主權(quán)的爭(zhēng)執(zhí)。而這次,站在中國(guó)的外交家背后的,已不只是熱血沸騰的學(xué)子,更是蒸蒸日上的國(guó)家實(shí)力。 

西漢名將陳湯曾在給漢元帝的上書中表示,明犯強(qiáng)漢者,雖遠(yuǎn)必誅。這句話成為了支撐百代中國(guó)人維護(hù)主權(quán)和領(lǐng)土完整的口號(hào)。疆不分遠(yuǎn)近,地不分大小,人不分男女老幼,而敵之犯我,必共抗之。如果到了海權(quán)意識(shí)迅速發(fā)展的21世紀(jì),還有國(guó)家抱著中國(guó)會(huì)在遙遠(yuǎn)的一隅小島上放水的幻想,那么就是大錯(cuò)特錯(cuò)。無(wú)論這塊疆土位于中國(guó)的什么地方,無(wú)論它富庶抑或荒涼,都是中國(guó)神圣不可分割的一部分,舍棄了,便是對(duì)歷史的背叛,對(duì)未來(lái)的失職。我們必須對(duì)青年負(fù)責(zé),對(duì)未來(lái)負(fù)責(zé)。也許法庭會(huì)對(duì)此感到疑惑,既然中國(guó)人如此在意南海星羅棋布的列島,何不參與到對(duì)菲仲裁中,而選擇了缺席呢? 

答案是,我們從未缺席。 

人活在世,行文處事,都要講究方式方法,國(guó)家間的交往亦然。中國(guó)從形式上缺席了南海的仲裁,正是因?yàn)樗问缴系牟缓戏āN覀儫o(wú)必向各位法官重申中國(guó)政府的觀點(diǎn),也無(wú)必重述我們與南海各方間雙邊解決的協(xié)議,我們只需要向各位法官表態(tài),在道德為王的法庭上,中國(guó)不會(huì)缺席;在主權(quán)攸關(guān)的審判上,中國(guó)不會(huì)缺席;在實(shí)力寫就的歷史上,中國(guó)不會(huì)缺席。97年前中國(guó)代表缺席了巴黎和會(huì)簽字,是對(duì)主權(quán)一種無(wú)可奈何的自保;而今天中國(guó)人的缺席,是因?yàn)槲覀冋龑⒏嗟木Ψ诺秸嬲亟鉀Q問(wèn)題的途徑上。習(xí)近平主席曾言,空談?wù)`國(guó),實(shí)干興邦。當(dāng)中國(guó)的青年正奮力團(tuán)結(jié)于中國(guó)夢(mèng)的感召之下,為全面提升祖國(guó)的實(shí)力而奮斗時(shí),來(lái)自地球另一端的弦外之音便早已如熏風(fēng)過(guò)耳,雖吹毫而不驚了。 

王毅外長(zhǎng)近日答阿拉伯媒體記者問(wèn)時(shí),回應(yīng)說(shuō)自己不喜歡將某個(gè)世紀(jì)叫做某個(gè)國(guó)家的世紀(jì),無(wú)論是美國(guó)的20世紀(jì)還是中國(guó)的21世紀(jì)。因?yàn)槊總€(gè)世紀(jì)的命運(yùn)乃至人類的命運(yùn),都是各國(guó)人民自己書寫的。但這只如椽的巨筆,必須按照各國(guó)人民能夠接受的方式落下,必須沿著公平正義的軌跡寫就,而絕非按照某些國(guó)家所提出的南海國(guó)際化等下策,在一片狺狺中草草收篇。面對(duì)錯(cuò)綜復(fù)雜的國(guó)際局勢(shì)和變幻多端的南海風(fēng)云,中國(guó)人過(guò)去沒(méi)有缺席,今天不會(huì)缺席,未來(lái)更不會(huì)缺席——并且會(huì)制定屬于自己的游戲規(guī)則,孰勝孰負(fù),還請(qǐng)諸君拭目以待。 

就是這樣一群普通的青年人,在忙碌的學(xué)習(xí)生活之余,向海牙同樣忙碌的法官們寫完了這樣一封信。無(wú)論我們的年齡懸殊之大、地位尊卑之顯,我們顯然都沒(méi)有過(guò)多的時(shí)間去領(lǐng)味生命中的嘈雜,那么不妨躬親戮力,都多去做一點(diǎn)實(shí)事——“牢騷太盛防腸斷,風(fēng)物長(zhǎng)宜放眼量 

   

   禮! 

南開大學(xué)       

燕山大學(xué)里仁學(xué)院       

山西大學(xué)       

內(nèi)蒙古工業(yè)大學(xué)      賈金曉

吉林大學(xué)       

華東政法大學(xué)       

蘇州大學(xué)       

寧波大學(xué)       姚丹春

合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)        

廈門大學(xué)       蔡曉娜

福建師范大學(xué)        

南昌大學(xué)       吳雪晨

山東大學(xué)        

鄭州大學(xué)         耀

湖南大學(xué)       王文娟

湘潭大學(xué)       陳緒林

華南理工大學(xué)       吳芷亦

     廣東東軟學(xué)院       江旭東

北京科技大學(xué)        

大同大學(xué)       程升譽(yù)

東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)       李樹愛

東華大學(xué)        

河南理工大學(xué)       閆李月

河南工程學(xué)院       彭托婭

 

2016528

 

Absence after 97 years

 

Distinguished judges from the Hague

 

 

It is said that the so-called Arbitration on the South China Sea will declare its result in the International Court of Justice in Hague in the near future. The Chinese government has already clearly stated its stance, that is non-participation, non-acceptance, and non-recognition. Chinese representatives will be absent in the court, so it is impossible to bring the trial with China’s absence. Concerning the China’s absence, it dates back to 1919. 97 years ago, also on the European continent, with its mild and wet climate, the Chinese representatives resolutely chose to be absent by refusing to sign the treaties of the Paris Peace Conference. After these 97 years, could we Chinese change our standing?

 

 

Exhausted and deprived, China in 1919 was plagued by foreign aggression and internal conflicts. The nationalist government at that time was tore apart by the warlords. China was impotent in handling the sovereignty disputes, so she had to remain silent in the face of foreign aggression. On the Shandong Peninsula and military ports occupied by Germany, which is the properties of China, Japanese expeditionary force launched attack against Germany and became a victor in WWI. While China, also a victor in WWI, had to endure another humiliation of losing territory and was demanded to cede Shandong to Japan during the Paris Peace Conference . This scene was vividly reproduced in the patriotic film A blockbuster Founding of the Republic when Chinese representative Gu Weijun refused to sign the treaty and delivered a sublime and heroic speech. Undoubtedly, Shandong is the territory of China. And why could we China, being the victor of the war, give away a part of our country to Japan?


 

These words are well-founded. Because the May 4th Movement just broke out at that time, during which all the young Chinese, with the burning flame in the heart with patriotism and indignation, gave their perseverant support to the diplomats for the sake of nation and people. What to build the foundation of this weak country were exactly those patriotic souls of young Chinese. Today, after nearly a century, the Chinese are once again absent from the so-called arbitration and agreement concerning territory and sovereignty dispute. And at this time, the backbone of these diplomats are not only the students burning with righteous indignation, but also a country with surging power.

 

 

A  well-known general of the Western Han dynasty, Chen Tang has written in a memorial to the throne that for those who encroaches upon we great China, we shall be bound to revenge no matter how far they run away! This sentence has become a slogan which supports hundred generations of the Chinese to safeguard the sovereignty and territorial integrity of China. When enemy invades, no matter how far the frontier is, no matter how little the territory is, all the Chinese, men, women, young and old, will rise up and fight back. In the 21st century, when sea power conscience is in full fledge, anyone who bears the illusion that China will shrink back and give up a little island because of its vast distance is committing a serious mistake. All territories, far or near, rich or desolate, are sacred parts of China. It constitutes the treason to the history and dereliction to the future. We must be responsible to the young Chinese and our future. The court may have such doubt that since China attaches such an importance to the scattered islands in the South China Sea, then why does it choose to be absent instead of taking part in the arbitration against the Philippines?

 

 

The answer is, we are never absent.

 

 

The manner holds the key for a man living in this world. This applies to the international relations. China is seemingly absent because the arbitration on the South China Sea is apparently illegal. It is unnecessary to reiterate the stance of Chinese government to you judges, let alone the bilateral agreement China signed with the parties concerned. All we need to do is to inform all the judges that in a court where ethic is the rule, China is never absent; in a trial where sovereignty is at stake, China is never absent; in the history written by power, China is never absent. The China’s absence 97 years ago demonstrates that China at that time had no choice if she would defend her sovereignty. But today the absence is due to the fact that we concentrate on the practical solutions to solve the problem. President Xi Jinping has said that empty talk will hamper the development of country, while solid work will revitalize the country. The contemporary young Chinese are united by the inspiration of Chinese dream in their struggle for a prosperous China, and the inharmonious sound from the other end of the world will no longer be disturbing.

 

RecentlyForeign minister Wang Yi responded the  inquiry from a Arab media reporter, he said he didn't like naming a century as “a nation’s centurywhether it is “the 20th century of the United States”or “the 21st century of China”. Because the fate of every centuryand even the fate of human beings are written by the world people. But like a rafter, this giant pen must follow the way people from different countries can accept, must be written along the path of justice, rather than following an unwise strategy some countries have put forward which is to internationalize the problem of the South China Sea, then solve this problem hastily. In the complicated international environment and the changeable situation of the South China Sea, the Chinese had not been absent in the past, not absent today, and definitely not absent in the future, and they will make their own game rules, so who will be the winner or loser, let’s wait and see.

 

 

This letter comes from a group of ordinary young people, in the busy study life, which express out feeling to you similarly busy judges in the Hague. No matter how different between you and us on age and  status, obviously, we have not too much time to taste the noise in life, so we are supposed to do something practical, just like a poetry says, “Too much complaint would make your heart break; so look farther when you  make judgment .”

 

 

With respect

 

Yours sincerely

 

Nankai University    Yao Chun

Liren College of Yanshan University    Wang Yue

Shanxi University       Ji Ming

Inner Mongolia University of Technology     Jia Jinxiao

Jilin University      Ma Chen

East China University of Political Science and Law        Kan Qi

Suzhou University       Zhu Lin

Ningbo University  Yao Danchun

Hefei University of Technology     Wang Bin

Xiamen University    Cai Xiaona

Fujian Normal University   Zheng Ying

Nanchang University  Wu Xuechen

Shandong University      Li Tong

Zhengzhou University      Yu Yao

Hunan University    Wang Wenjuan

Xiangtan University      Zheng Xulin

South China University of Technology        Wu Zhiyi

Neusoft Institute,Guangdong     Jiang Xudong

University of Science & Technology Beijing        Lv Xin

Datong University    Cheng Shengyu

Northeast Agricultural University         Li Shu’ai

Donghua University         Fu Huang

Henan Polytechnic University         Yan Liyue

Henan Institute OfEngineering        PengTuoya

May the 28th,2016

 

 

責(zé)任編輯:高天
特別申明:

1、本文只代表作者個(gè)人觀點(diǎn),不代表本站觀點(diǎn),僅供大家學(xué)習(xí)參考;

2、本站屬于非營(yíng)利性網(wǎng)站,如涉及版權(quán)和名譽(yù)問(wèn)題,請(qǐng)及時(shí)與本站聯(lián)系,我們將及時(shí)做相應(yīng)處理;

3、歡迎各位網(wǎng)友光臨閱覽,文明上網(wǎng),依法守規(guī),IP可查。

熱點(diǎn)排行
  • 一周
  • 一月
  • 半年
  • 建言點(diǎn)贊
  • 一周
  • 一月
  • 半年
  • 圖片新聞

    友情鏈接
  • 北京市趙曉魯律師事務(wù)所
  • 186導(dǎo)航
  • 紅旗文稿
  • 人大經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇
  • 光明網(wǎng)
  • 宣講家網(wǎng)
  • 三沙新聞網(wǎng)
  • 西征網(wǎng)
  • 四月網(wǎng)
  • 法律知識(shí)大全
  • 法律法規(guī)文庫(kù)
  • 最高人民法院
  • 最高人民檢察院
  • 中央紀(jì)委監(jiān)察部
  • 共產(chǎn)黨新聞網(wǎng)
  • 新華網(wǎng)
  • 央視網(wǎng)
  • 中國(guó)政府網(wǎng)
  • 中國(guó)新聞網(wǎng)
  • 全國(guó)政協(xié)網(wǎng)
  • 全國(guó)社科辦
  • 全國(guó)人大網(wǎng)
  • 中國(guó)軍網(wǎng)
  • 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)網(wǎng)
  • 人民日?qǐng)?bào)
  • 求是理論網(wǎng)
  • 人民網(wǎng)
  • 備案/許可證編號(hào):京ICP備15015626號(hào)-1 昆侖策咨詢服務(wù)(北京)有限公司版權(quán)所有 舉報(bào)郵箱:kunlunce@yeah.net